First of all to everyone who truly love Marvel and Spiderman, get ready to hate me. If you have seen the posters and the trailer, m afraid the best part of the movie is over. I was upset but now I am raged at the same old crap Marvel has been feeding their fans over the years. Not anymore will I watch marvel movies in the theater and waste my time, money and my good mood. The only out of the box movie Marvel had created is 'X Men First Class'.
The movie sucked so much that I have no idea where to start. Ok let's say this is a new generation Spiderman. A cooler, cuter much more of an asshole than the classic Spiderman. Spiderman when created by Stan Lee back in nineteen-sixty-three was a huge hit because he was this smart and not so good with the ladies (probably because he was a very average looking fella). Spiderman became the most loved superhero because back in the day all the mainstream heroes were men!strong, well-built, middle-aged, rich men. Whereas Spiderman was this teenager who had a minimum wage job yet he was a superhero and not a side-kick of the main hero like in most of the comics back then. As you can see for yourself all the descriptions of Spiderman were made justice to in the trilogy and not in the latest dump Marvel has taken on us. I would have liked the story and the plot if Marvel had made the same movie but called it 'the amazing superhero'. What I mean is they should have created a new superhero instead of using Spiderman's goodwill to attract the audience.
Even if they made the movie introducing a new superhero completely the direction would still be a very bad cliche. I want Marvel to take one advice from their competition, DC, who I think has already won the race. WHY DON'T YOU HIRE BIG ESTABLISHED DIRECTORS TO DIRECT YOUR MOVIES?
DC's watchmen directed by Snyder and the Dark knight trilogy by Nolan are revolutionary movies in the comic movie genre. Why don't you, Marvel, hire good directors? I was just wondering how awesome Spiderman would look if it was made by Tarantino or Aronofsky. Think about it. Its time to take your classics to next level or in no time classics will become cliches.
Who writes 'property of Peter Parker' on their camera? And who would you take that with you when you want your identity to be a secret?
The whole movie was kind of running. the scene where he realizes he has superpowers lacked the impact, (unlike the first movie) it was rather amusing.
He googles everything like a fucking dumbfuck. He even googles 'spider bite'.
On the whole I think the cast and crew is hotter and dumber like most of the youngsters today that is why the movie made a record breaking collection at the box office. I think the only people liked this movie were girls dating nerds who had no idea who Spiderman is. Now they know Spiderman is a cool, cute asshole who beats up bullies when he gets the strength to. What a horrible..HORRIBLE depiction of Spiderman.
The movie sucked so much that I have no idea where to start. Ok let's say this is a new generation Spiderman. A cooler, cuter much more of an asshole than the classic Spiderman. Spiderman when created by Stan Lee back in nineteen-sixty-three was a huge hit because he was this smart and not so good with the ladies (probably because he was a very average looking fella). Spiderman became the most loved superhero because back in the day all the mainstream heroes were men!strong, well-built, middle-aged, rich men. Whereas Spiderman was this teenager who had a minimum wage job yet he was a superhero and not a side-kick of the main hero like in most of the comics back then. As you can see for yourself all the descriptions of Spiderman were made justice to in the trilogy and not in the latest dump Marvel has taken on us. I would have liked the story and the plot if Marvel had made the same movie but called it 'the amazing superhero'. What I mean is they should have created a new superhero instead of using Spiderman's goodwill to attract the audience.
Even if they made the movie introducing a new superhero completely the direction would still be a very bad cliche. I want Marvel to take one advice from their competition, DC, who I think has already won the race. WHY DON'T YOU HIRE BIG ESTABLISHED DIRECTORS TO DIRECT YOUR MOVIES?
DC's watchmen directed by Snyder and the Dark knight trilogy by Nolan are revolutionary movies in the comic movie genre. Why don't you, Marvel, hire good directors? I was just wondering how awesome Spiderman would look if it was made by Tarantino or Aronofsky. Think about it. Its time to take your classics to next level or in no time classics will become cliches.
Who writes 'property of Peter Parker' on their camera? And who would you take that with you when you want your identity to be a secret?
The whole movie was kind of running. the scene where he realizes he has superpowers lacked the impact, (unlike the first movie) it was rather amusing.
He googles everything like a fucking dumbfuck. He even googles 'spider bite'.
On the whole I think the cast and crew is hotter and dumber like most of the youngsters today that is why the movie made a record breaking collection at the box office. I think the only people liked this movie were girls dating nerds who had no idea who Spiderman is. Now they know Spiderman is a cool, cute asshole who beats up bullies when he gets the strength to. What a horrible..HORRIBLE depiction of Spiderman.
